Comparison: NetNut vs IPRoyal vs ABCProxy for Rotating Residential Proxies
Below is a focused comparison of NetNut, IPRoyal, and ABCProxy specifically for use cases that require rotating residential proxies (web scraping, ad verification, price aggregation, bypassing geo-blocks, avoiding captchas, etc.). I cover the core facts, the practical advantages and drawbacks of each provider for rotating/residential workflows, and a short recommendation for typical use-cases.
Quick headline facts (most load-bearing)
-
NetNut advertises an ~85 million residential/IP pool and promotes ISP-level rotation with unlimited concurrency. NetNut+1
-
IPRoyal advertises ~32M+ residential IPs, pay-as-you-go / traffic pricing, and built-in auto-rotate (customizable intervals). IPRoyal+1
-
ABCProxy markets itself with a very large pool (100–200M+ claims), city-level targeting, both rotating and sticky/resident-static options, and lower entry price points on some plans. ABCProxy+1
(Those three points above are the main factual anchors cited from each provider’s public pages — I use them below when weighing pros/cons.)
NetNut:
NetNut focuses on enterprise-grade infrastructure and advertises ISP-level rotation (they emphasize rotation coming from ISP-centric sources rather than purely peer-to-peer). They offer both rotating residential and static residential products, docs and endpoint tooling for quick integration, and highlight high concurrency.
Advantages
-
High advertised pool & ISP-level routing — good for fewer re-uses of the same ASN and for scraping sites that flag datacenter traffic. (NetNut claims ~85M IPs and ISP-level routing.) NetNut+1
-
Unlimited concurrency claims — beneficial for large-scale parallel scraping jobs where you need many simultaneous threads.
-
Clear product split: rotating vs static — makes it easy to choose rotating-residential for anonymity or static-residential for session/account work.
Drawbacks / things to watch
Price can be higher than budget alternatives — enterprise positioning typically costs more per GB or proxy compared with low-cost pools.-
Opacity on exact sourcing / deduplication — large providers differ in how they source and de-duplicate IPs; NetNut is strong on infrastructure but exact sourcing details matter for some compliance use-cases.
-
Some reviewers note sticky behavior — rotating pools may still present sticky sessions in practice depending on endpoint choices; test before committing.
Best for: teams needing robust throughput, ISP-level routing, and enterprise integrations where scale and uptime are priorities.
IPRoyal:
Advantages
-
Very cost-competitive & traffic-based pricing — pay-as-you-go or subscription options make it attractive for smaller teams or variable workloads. (IPRoyal lists traffic pricing and promotional rates.) IPRoyal+1
Auto-rotate + manual rotation API/dashboard — you can set rotation intervals (seconds/minutes/hours), or swap IPs via API for flexible session control. IPRoyal-
Simple auth and tooling — whitelist or USER:PASS options and browser extensions make quick testing easy. IPRoyal+1
Drawbacks / things to watch
-
Smaller pool than some competitors (32M+ vs 100M+) — pool size matters for uniqueness when you need lots of different residential IPs in a short time window. IPRoyal
-
Less enterprise tooling than the biggest players — if you need advanced routing, dedicated SLAs, or specialized regional sourcing, you may need to validate suitability.
-
Potential for variable performance on tough anti-bot targets — cheaper pools sometimes have lower success rates on very strict endpoints; test against your target sites.
Best for: cost-sensitive projects, pilots, SMBs or anyone wanting flexible traffic pricing and easy rotation controls without enterprise price tags.
ABCProxy:
ABCProxy positions itself as a very large residential network with strong geo-granularity and a variety of plans including rotating ISP/residential, sticky, and static options. They emphasize ethical sourcing and fine-grained targeting (country/state/city).
Advantages
-
Huge advertised pool & granular targeting — ABCProxy advertises 100–200M+ IPs and city-level targeting, which helps when you must appear from specific small geographies. ABCProxy+1
-
Multiple rotation modes — rotating per-request, session-rotation, or longer sticky sessions for account/logged-in workflows. ABCProxy+1
-
Competitive entry pricing and special unlimited packages — their pricing pages show many plan types (GB, unlimited daily plans), which can be cost-efficient for predictable high-volume needs. ABCProxy --> Pricing
Drawbacks / things to watch
-
Marketing claims should be validated with tests — very large pool numbers are attractive but you should verify deduplication, true geographic distribution, and success rates on your target sites.
-
Support / SLA differences between plans — as with many providers, enterprise SLAs are typically behind higher-tier plans.
-
Complex plan choices — many plan types (unlimited, per-GB, ISP vs residential vs mobile) mean you should choose carefully to avoid overpaying for features you don’t need.
Best for: projects needing extreme geographic precision or very large, persistent rotating pools; teams that want both rotating and sticky modes with granular targeting.
Practical comparison of rotating-residential proxy network criteria:
-
Rotation control (per-request vs sticky sessions) -
Pool size & diversity (important when you need many unique residential IPs quickly)
-
ABCProxy claims the largest (100–200M+), then NetNut (~85M), then IPRoyal (~32M). Bigger pools reduce IP re-use and lower blocking risk.
-
-
Throughput / concurrency
-
NetNut advertises unlimited concurrency and ISP-level infrastructure for high throughput. IPRoyal and ABCProxy also support high concurrency, but NetNut’s marketing emphasizes scale. NetNut+1
-
-
Pricing model
-
IPRoyal: strongly traffic/GB-based with pay-as-you-go (good for variable use). IPRoyal Pricing
-
ABCProxy: mixed (GB, unlimited daily plans, per-IP offers). ABCProxy Pricing
-
NetNut: typically higher, enterprise pricing (often per-GB or dedicated plans) — test pricing with your volume. NetNut Pricing (scroll over the nav bar to view without clicking)
-
-
Geo-targeting & city-level precision
-
ABCProxy leads for claimed city/state targeting. NetNut and IPRoyal offer country-level and some city-level options — always verify with test queries for your target cities. ABCProxy+1
-
Recommendations / which to pick
-
If you need enterprise-scale throughput and ISP-level routing (and budget isn’t the primary constraint): NetNut — good for large parallel scraping, fewer network hiccups, and when ISP-level routing matters. NetNut+1 -
If you’re cost-sensitive, running pilots, or want flexible traffic-based billing: IPRoyal — cheaper entry, easy auto-rotate controls, good for small-to-medium scraping or testing. IPRoyal+1
-
If you require very large pool diversity and fine-grained geo targeting (city/state) or want many plan options: ABCProxy — best to test their claims for your sites, but they advertise very large pools and flexible rotation/sticky modes. ABCProxy+1
Quick checklist before buying / testing any rotating residential proxy provider
-
Do a real test against your target sites (rotate mode, session mode, concurrency you’ll use). Success rate matters more than claimed pool size.
-
Measure request success rate, latency, and captcha triggers over thousands of requests.
-
Verify geo-distribution for the specific cities you need (not just country-level).
-
Ask about IP deduplication policies (some providers may re-use the same IP across customers).
-
Check legal / compliance / ethical sourcing if your use-case has regulatory constraints.
-
Confirm billing model (per-GB, per-proxy, daily unlimited) and do cost projections for your volume.




